Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

The Importance Of The Nose Tackle Position In The Colts Tampa-2 Scheme

Despite what many think or say, the Colts, like all other teams that run the famed 'Tampa-2' defense, do indeed utilize a nose tackle along the defensive line.

We've often written about how the Colts use (or misuse) their defensive tackles, but every once and a while it helps to get a refresher on some of the finer details of how the 'Tampa-2' system works, particularly on the defensive line.

For starters, the 'Tampa-2' is actually a coverage term that has more to do with linebackers and defensive backs than d-linemen. It's a variation on the old 'Cover-2' defense which was made famous in the 1970s with the Pittsburgh Steelers 'Steel Curtain' teams. While former Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy and his one-time defensive coordinator in Tampa Bay, Monte Kiffin, often get praise for changing the NFL with the 'Tampa-2' coverage variation, what they did strategically along the defensive line is equally interesting to dissect.

These changes in how linemen line-up and attack an offense are often lumped in with the term 'Tampa-2.' Rod Marineli, the current defensive coordinator of the Chicago Bears and one-time assistant under Dungy in Tampa Bay, also deserves credit for the unique why 'Tampa-2' teams attack offensive lines.

The principles and strategies these men standardized back the '90s are still use today in places like Indy, Chicago, Tennessee, Detroit, and now, apparently, New England. It is helpful to understand how these strategies work if one wishes to understand why the Colts are still very thin at the defensive tackle spot despite the additions of players like Tommie Harris and Drake Nevis.

Star-divide

Joe Dolan of FantasyGuru.com recently wrote an outstanding explanation on how basic NFL defensive alignments work, and he dedicated a good portion of his article to 'Tampa-2' defensive line fronts.

4-3 Fronts – In the early part of this century, Tony Dungy and Monte Kiffin popularized something that had been around since the 1980s: the "under front" in their Tampa-2 defense (which we’ll get to a little more in depth in a little bit). Essentially, the under front shifted the entire defensive line away from the strong side of the offensive line. In the under front, one defensive tackle is shaded directly over the center (a nose tackle), while another, more athletic interior lineman – the undertackle or 3-technique – lines up in the B gap in a more traditional DE position (think Warren Sapp). Then, the team’s best pass rusher (think Simeon Rice) is free to rush from the extreme edge of the offensive line. If each player maintains his responsibility, run plays can be filtered to the LBs.

The "over front," which shifts the line toward the strong side of the offense, is also common to see in today’s NFL. The idea is to create mismatches and get athletic players in their best position to succeed. It’s an example of the constantly changing NFL in that coaches will tweak the traditional 4-3 to best reflect the talent that’s on the field. As an undertackle, more athletic defensive tackles like Detroit’s Ndamukong Suh can overpower slower offensive guards and put up huge sack numbers from the interior line. While different coaches do different things with their 4-3 fronts, the important thing to remember is they’re all trying to create mismatches. That’s how games are won in today’s NFL.

For the Colts, over the past few years we've seen players like Raheem Brock, Larry Tripplett, Montae Reagor, Daniel Muir, and Fili Moala all play well as the undertackle or 3-technique tackle. Speed, quickness, and burst are valued here over girth, size, and strength.

When people say, 'The Colts don't need big fatties, but small guys to shoot the gap and funnel to the linebackers,' they are referring to 3-tech DTs whether they know it or not.

It is the tackle that lines up over the center, the 'nose tackle' as Dolan calls him (overtackle in some other lexicons) that the Colts have truly struggled to find and retain over the years.

They spent big money in 2005 on Corey Simon to fill this role, and he did for only one season until poly-arthritis cost him his career.

They made a big trade in 2006 for Booger McFarland, who was the gold standard of Tampa-2 nose tackles back then. No coincidence that Indy won a Super Bowl that year. Their run defense in the playoffs was dominant. Booger blew out his knee in camp the following year, and his career was finished.

Ed Johnson was stout as the nose tackle in 2007, up until he was kicked off the team in early in the 2008 season.

In 2009, Antonio Johnson solidified the role of 'overtackle' in the Colts Tampa-2. However, last year, for reasons we really still don't know (injuries? coach's doghouse? stupidity? edict from Bill Polian?) the Colts sat Mookie for much of the year used Daniel Muir as the overtackle and Fili Moala as the 3-tech.

The results were disaster. The Colts surrendered 2,032 rushing yards in 2010, at 4.6 a carry.

Now, Muir is gone. Mookie is re-signed to a three-year deal, and the Colts have roped in a couple more 3-tech DTs in Nevis and Harris. However, the key question of depth still remains: Outside of Mookie, who on this team can play nose tackle in the Tampa-2?

Don't say Moala. He simply doesn't have the mindset. Also, he might not be big enough. Mookie is 310-315. Fili is 305. When Moala he did play NT last year, he got consistently blown off the line by the center. Harris and Nevis are strict 3-tech talents. There's been talk of moving Jamaal Anderson to DT on passing downs, but, again, that is as a 3-tech. Same with Eric Foster. He, like Anderson, plays DE and 3-tech DT on passing downs.

The other DTs on the roster include a rookie free agent named Ollie Obgu and two vets: DeMario Pressley, and John Gill.

Obgu, at 6'1, 285 pounds, sounds more like a 3-tech talent. In fact, when you read his scouting reports coming out of Penn State, it's pretty obvious he isn't a NT.

Pressley, at 6'3, 301 pounds, is interesting. But, after being drafted by the Saints in the 5th round in 2008, he's been released, picked up by the Texans, and then released again. If Pressley were good at stopping the run, I highly doubt the Saints and Texans would have just cut him.

John Gill is 6'3, 302 pounds. He's mostly known as the guy who got drunk and pissed his pants before being arrested outside a strip club one year ago today. The Colts were kind enough not to cut him, placing the former Northwestern Wildcat on the injury list for 2010.

So, when look at this roster, outside of Mookie, the Colts have no one who can effectively play the NT spot in the Tampa-2. Should Mookie get hurt (and odds are, he will), teams will simply bash the football down the Colts throat by exploiting their weakness at the NT spot.

Lack of depth here is a big reason why idiots like me are SCREAMING that the Colts sign Pat Williams, formerly of the Vikings. Like Booger McFarland, Williams is considered gold standard of Tampa-2 NTs. He's a free agent right now, and at 38-years-old, he's likely looking for reserve role on a championship caliber team that plays Tampa-2. 

Tampa-2 NTs don't grow on trees, and without one the Tampa-2 defense simply does not work. And if the Colts struggle again to stop the run, they simply have no shot at getting to and winning another Super Bowl.

[UPDATE] I neglected to mention Ricardo Mathews, DT for the Colts at 6'3, 295. He is playing a lot of NT in camp. So, maybe he can do it, but I have my doubts.

Comment 51 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What about Ricardo Matthews?

I thought that’s where he was going be as a back up.

Every Breath That Is In Your Lungs
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me

by DClark#44 on Aug 8, 2011 5:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

From the reports from TC so far...

Sounds like Rico has bulked up and was playing 1-tech

by GoHorse88 on Aug 8, 2011 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

As a Minneapolis Resident...

I’ve seen too many Vikings games for my likings, but Pat has plenty left in the tank…especially as a 2 down run stuffer

Every Breath That Is In Your Lungs
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me

by DClark#44 on Aug 8, 2011 5:56 PM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

I did notice that Minni was missed on the list of Tampa-2 teams in the original article

The Colts should definitely be looking at the Vikings, pre-2010, who were at the top of the league in stopping the run for several years playing the same scheme your team has so much trouble stopping the run in.

by 108 on Aug 9, 2011 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

nose tackle

Both Booger Mcfarland and Ed Johnson were about 6’1" AND 300LBS and played nt very well.I read an article recently comparing Nevis to Mcfarland at LSU. I think Nevis gets reps at tthe under tackle while Harris backs up Maola.

by zorro7114 on Aug 8, 2011 6:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Harris and Moala would also be undertackle, same as Nevis, right?

by Indyrampage on Aug 8, 2011 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.

by Brad Wells on Aug 8, 2011 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you. This is my point to zorro how does Nevis get reps at ut while Harris backs moala. That statement doesn’t make sense per their position unless he means they’re all backing eachother.

by Indyrampage on Aug 9, 2011 1:24 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

zorro7114 was typing nonsense

Based on the context provided prior to that last sentence, he probably means Nevis will get reps as the OVERTACKLE (1-tech, nose tackle) and thus serve as Johnson’s backup, while Harris backs up Moala as the undertackle (3-tech).

However, word is that Mathews and Ogbu have been getting snaps at the nose. If Ogbu impresses enough at camp I could see the Colts carrying a ton of d-linemen into the season with a rotation of moala, harris, nevis, mookie, ogbu, mathews, with freeney, mathis, hughes as pass-rushing DEs, and foster/anderson as run-defending DEs. Of course, 11 d-linemen is quite a bit. Last season the colts final roster had only 9….Let’s say the colts go with the middle ground and keep 10 on the roster. I would see mathews or foster as the odd-man out in this case since I think Ogbu offers more upside, and anderson makes foster somewhat expendable.

by LeftNutForAStarCenter on Aug 9, 2011 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

How many D lineman do we keep?

Freeney, Hughes
Moala, Harris, Nevis, Foster
Johnson
Mathis, Anderson
 
Ogbu, Pressley, Gill, Chick,
Do we keep 10 on the roster. If so who?

by VERNON HOWELL on Aug 8, 2011 6:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Ogbu

I’m a penn state fan so maybe I’m biased but he can play. He’s beefed up a bit and can play the NT position, and theres no way we keep chick if hughes and anderson stay (foster can play a little end if needed too). I haven’t heard anything about Gill and Pressley is ehhh. Mathews could compete too. I think Ogbu should get the nod plus his name is awesome. If not could see him on the practice squad

by wicker on Aug 8, 2011 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't forget Mathews

I’d say he’s got an inside track on those 4 other guys (as well as maybe Eric Foster)

by BoilerHerrm on Aug 8, 2011 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Foster

never been a big foster fan. he’s ok but if nevis shows anything he’s clearly the 4th undertackle, and we really need to be 4 deep at that position?

by wicker on Aug 8, 2011 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love his energy

But I think he’s expendable

by BoilerHerrm on Aug 8, 2011 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea he is fun and a spaz.

by moocow on Aug 8, 2011 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I say keep 10, 1 or 2 on PS

Last year, health-wise was a fluke on DL. That’s why we ended up with only 8 at the end of the year.

Here are my best guess for the those spots:

RE: Freeney – Hughes – Foster
UT: Moala – Harris – Nevis
NT: Mookie – Mathews
LE: Mathis – Anderson

PS – Ogbu, maybe Chick again

Of course, this is all subject to change depending on health and pre-season performance.

by GoHorse88 on Aug 8, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're right. Despite team-wide rash of injuries, DL was relatively healthy last year

Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy

by zherebyonki on Aug 8, 2011 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would rather see Ogbu

Over mathews or foster. I think Ogbu may be better and have more upside that Mathews, and I just think Anderson makes foster expendable.

by LeftNutForAStarCenter on Aug 9, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pat would be nice for a year, maybe two with the decresed practice shedule and playing a reserve role. After that we are right back in the same situation.

by Indyrampage on Aug 8, 2011 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, but...

those two years buy the FO time to find a NT for the future.

The Indianapolis Colts are going to be the 1st team to win a super bowl in their own stadium. 'nuff said.

by It'sAlways18 on Aug 8, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt Colts sign Pat Williams. He is a mountain of a man, but my guess is, at this point in his career he can’t rush the passer at all. Teerlink’s philosophy is to stop the run on the way to the quarterback. The Colts don’t like players who can’t rush the passer.
If I am wrong, and Pat Williams can still move (rather than still being good at ot being moved), then hey, if it is inexpensive the Colts should grab him.
 
 I still remember when Ted Washington was a free agent….the Colts didn’t sign him either. Probaby for the same reason.

I liked the portion of the article from Joe Dolan above, because it gets at the fact that defenses are always changing. Just because someone wrote somewhere that this is what one DT should do, and this is what another DT should do in order for it to be “Cover 2” is meaningless.

by moocow on Aug 8, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

'The Colts don’t like players who can’t rush the passer'

Then why is Mookie on the team? 1.5 career sacks in three years.

I don’t think Teerlinck is as ‘all out’ the the passer as you suggest. The NT is there to demolish the center, not rush the QB or shoot the gaps.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.

by Brad Wells on Aug 8, 2011 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually BBS…I think it is the fact that he only has 1.5 career sacks in that period of time that that puts Mookie in the dog house. Not because of your Bill Polian bashing nonsense.

Because Teerlink IS all out to get the passer. I think Larry Coyer is more the Tom Moore type. Tweek the defense to fit the personnel.

I know what a NT is supposed to do.
The Colts don’t look to sign the big 2 Down Run Stuffers.

by moocow on Aug 8, 2011 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

In other words, Mookie does a good just as a 2 Down Run Stuffer. I think he is content to just be that, and the Colts coaches want more….i.e. effort toward a pass rush.

by moocow on Aug 8, 2011 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Teerlink's philosophy
Teerlink’s philosophy is to stop the run on the way to the quarterback.

Does anyone else see any serious flaws in this approach? If this is indeed his philosophy, the players are being taught to zero in on the QB, which would essentially mean that they aren’t keeping their eyes on the ball and therefore are not correctly maintaining their gaps at the point of attack. This would explain why counters, screen passes and misdirection plays work so well against the Colts. They are so busy trying to get to the QB that they may lose sight of the diagram of the play and get burned by a playcall that is typically stopped consistently well by more disciplined teams.

I need someone to better explain the philosophy to me as the Colts run it and why it is an effective approach.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Aug 8, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I need someone to better explain the philosophy to me as the Colts run it and why it is an effective approach.

You may have noticed that it’s not always particularly effective….

The goal is to use speed and quickness to disrupt timing, coupled with discipline on the back end to force a long, mistake-free drive. .. I guess? It seems borne more out of a lack of available good D-linemen than anything else. Who can name a pro-bowl pass rushing DE that plays the run well? Peppers? Abraham? M. Williams?

The big, dominant DTs aren’t a dime a dozen either, and they aren’t 3 down players generally. It’s going to be DL by committee and DL isn’t the focus of our team. The Colts are not going to be loaded on the DL like the NYG were.

Colts put up points, they need to stop other teams from putting up more, they don’t need to shut them out. It would be nice, though…

by _-*JUICE*-_ on Aug 8, 2011 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

*not being moved

by moocow on Aug 8, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

great article

I am still upset we didn’t go for haynesworth, we missed the boat big time there. Very tired of getting run over in the run game and having to hope Peyton can carry us. Hopefully we can do something good before season starts.

by coltsgolfbeer on Aug 8, 2011 6:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Haynesworth

He is going to backfire….don’t worry. If he is still on the team at week 8 I will be impressed.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Aug 8, 2011 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haynesworth

Aren’t they planning on using haynesworth as a 3 tech in new England with wilfork as the nose? I could be wrong, but isn’t that where he thrived in tenn? If that’s the case we have plenty of depth there so why take the risk on haynesworth? Supposedly that’s part of the reason he was malcontent in Washington. He wanted to rush and they wanted him to play nose. Again I could be wrong, but that seems to be how I remember it.

by Kdog@usi on Aug 8, 2011 7:03 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You sir, are correct

that is exactly what happened in WAS.

The Indianapolis Colts are going to be the 1st team to win a super bowl in their own stadium. 'nuff said.

by It'sAlways18 on Aug 8, 2011 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's how he wants to play,

But you won’t see a Colts-style 4-3 defense, more a traditional Patriots 3-4, perhaps with a shift, before one of the OLBs sticks his hand in the dirt to rush.

"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West

by ISN on Aug 9, 2011 2:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great article

Here’s a similar article written last year by 3k over at Turf Show Times: http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2009/8/2/972231/the-pbp-gaps-techniques-and-the

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.

by Brad Wells on Aug 8, 2011 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks BBS

I love articles like this that discuss technical strategy.

by mtfearin on Aug 8, 2011 7:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe we intend to use a Jay Ratliff kind of approach

Putting Harris and Nevis together on passing downs might be an approach akin to what the Giants have had against good passing teams, and an approach Wade Philips took with Jay Ratliff at NT. The double team comes via either demanding it due to your bulk and strength or beating the center one-on-one that they have to assign a weak side pulling guard to you because you are winning one-on-one battles.

Either way you get the double team, you free up your LBs to make plays, IMO. The key is to have active UTs with long arms that can wrap up and slow down the RB, if not stop them right away for the LBs to finish.

Ultimately, the goal is prevention of the O-line progress.

by chad72 on Aug 8, 2011 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

To add to that...

…if you see a FB, you have to play safety closer to the box.

With Coyer, we have seen single safety high so many times that Bethea has to be top 3 in tackles on the team the last 2 years. Our safety is our extra line of defense for the last 2 years vs running teams.

by chad72 on Aug 8, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

great article

although i dont want pat williams

by omahacolt on Aug 8, 2011 7:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with this article for the most part, great article I love this type of stuff.

I think one the reasons Mookie didn’t start as much, was injuries, another reason is his ability to get pressure on the quaterback. Colts don’t want any of their players to put two hands on a guy and hold him up. The Colts want them to shoot the gap, in Mookie’s case the gap between the Center and the Guard. If you watch mookie line up he will be on the outside shoulder of the center in between the center and guard.

The reason they retained him was because, after reviewing film all year it was pretty apparent that the defense played much better when he was in there. I believe that both Ogbu and Nevis played on that side in college and are experienced at the 1 technique. I would rather they bring in a vet, but if Ogbu works out they may be deeper at the 1 tech than they have in a long time.

I am starting to get excited about the interior of the DL for the first time in a long time.

Defense is more important than breathing.

by BetterD on Aug 8, 2011 8:52 PM EDT reply actions  

According to all Moala's senior season scouting reports..

It says hes fit either to play a 5-tech in a 3-4 defense or a 1-tech in a 4-3, because he can hold down at the POA but doesn’t offer much pass-rushing moves. About 4 sites say this so I’m wondering why we’re playing him at 3-tech?

Contributing writer at www.Coltsider.com

by YeahItsDanny on Aug 8, 2011 9:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree

I wasn’t sure he was a 3 tech when they drafted him and had questions about that, but thought he would be brought in as a 5 tech because the Colts might be willing to try some 3-4 fronts at times. Either way his scouting reports seemed to indicate that he was better at holding blockers than he was at getting to the quarterback or disrupting the backfield.

But I am sitting on my couch typing this, not at 56th Street so obviously I don’t know too much.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Aug 8, 2011 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tommie Harris

Should be NT, use Mookie as 2nd dt on 1st and 2nd down and Foster with Harris on obvious pass rush situations

by coltsftw18to87 on Aug 8, 2011 11:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Mookie will be nt with everyone else rotating through. I know people have suggested it but I don’t see Harris being the starting nt.

by Indyrampage on Aug 9, 2011 1:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Harris is no NT

As someone who’s watched a fair amount of Bears football, he’s got great athleticism and is excellent shooting his gap (when healthy) but he is definitely a Tampa-2 UNDERtackle. He’d be no better at nose than most of the 3-techs you already had.

by 108 on Aug 9, 2011 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good article, BBS. The Tampa-2 really is an interesting thing to break down.

I’m all for one year of Pat Williams, just like we did with Booger in 2006. Hopefully it happens.

Ricardo Matthews looks like he has some potential there as well, but with Mookie and Pat Williams, that to me is adequate.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Aug 9, 2011 12:49 AM EDT reply actions  

It's an underrated position in the scheme for sure.

Main reason is the nose doesn’t get the stats. He’s the ‘other’ d linemen in the tampa-2. That being said, some Tampa-2 teams that put more emphasis on run stopping (Bears, Vikings) do put more resources into addressing the position. The Vikings had Pat Williams there until recently, and the Bears just drafted Stephen Paea in the 2nd round hoping he’ll be a stalwart at 1-tech. Ultimately, each team only has so many resources to spend on aquiring players, and the Colts priorities goes something like Manning-Receivers/Running Backs – Defensive Ends – More Receivers / Backs – Everything else. You end up with a team very good at some things and quite mediocre at others, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat, ie build a winning team.

by 108 on Aug 9, 2011 2:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Stop the Run ?

When have we stopped the run for more than a game or 2 ? I know we were better when Sanders could blow up plays but look what happened to him. Not good for his health. When you have small linebackers you have to have size at the D tackles. Guards, lots of them way over 300 lbs, tackles 320 plus blocking down, you have to have tackles who can keep them off undersized linebackers. If you don’t have them , you have the Colts D which cannot stop the run. I rest my case.

by MrBoJangles46 on Aug 9, 2011 6:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake