Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

What would you Choose?

I've been wondering what most people would take if given a situation such as the one I am going to present.

Situation: You drafted your Qb of the future and are building an offense, and someone gives you a choice between these two packages after the jump

Star-divide

A. The Reciver Package: You gets players of the caliber of: WR1: Andre JOhnson, WR2: Larry Fitzgerald Slot: Wes Welker, TE: Jimmy Graham, RB: Adrian Peterson - O line is pretty bad - for the sake of rating it, lets use the Madden ratings: no one on the line is over a 75.

B: O-Line Package: You get players of the caliber of: RT: Joe Thomas RG: Jahri Evans C: Nick Mangold LG: Logan Mankins LT: Jake Long - Skill player corps is pretty bad - similar to receiver package, no WR/TE/RB would have a rating over 75

Which package would you take? and Why? Would you rather give your young quarterback weapons or protection, obviously in the NFL you don't have to specialize in one area but just for my purposes you solidify one then go to the other. I just want to know what is valued more, having great O-Line play or great WR/TE/RB play in peoples opinion. The QB is the same person in both situations btw, in our case it would be A. Luck

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This isn't even a challenge

In the real world you always take the o-line. With a elite line it makes your QB/RB/Receivers all look better.

NeXt Man Up

by Dann Giszewski on Feb 10, 2012 9:54 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

But in real life you would have an entire defense of undrafted free agents due to constant cap problems.

by cq.noble on Feb 10, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Receiver package easily.

Sure O Line is very important, but a good quarterback can make that 75 rating look like an 85. And I’d trade AJ for CJ.

by mlc2656 on Feb 11, 2012 7:16 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

If Luck

I take the o-line. If it was Tom Brady or Manning, I’d take the receivers.

There's only 1 true friend in life. Jack Daniels.

by KBUnitz on Feb 13, 2012 1:11 AM EST reply actions  

Agree with this.

But Brady has always had a great O line and his receivers (except Welker and except Moss in 07) are usually average. So it’s tough to say how Brady would do with a below avg line because he hasn’t had one.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 13, 2012 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake