Most of us knew (or strongly assumed) that Luck was the better choice. That has never been more obvious than now. A quick review of important numbers:
RGIII has 9 total TD's this year, and 12 total TO's
Luck has 13 total TD's this year, and 5 total TO's
RGIII has a 37.6 QBR this year
Luck has a 71.9 QBR this year
RGIII is supposed to be the very superior runner, but Luck has better numbers and less attempts:
RGIII has 240 rushing yards, 5.6 per carry, 11 first downs, and 0 TD's
Luck has 183 rushing yards, 6.5 per carry, 10 first downs, and 3 TD's
Most importantly, Luck has 5 wins vs RGIII's 2 wins this year through 7 games.
What would our record be with RGIII? What would the outlook of our favorite team be for the next 5-10 years? How differently would you view Pagano and Grigson, assuming we had the same players, same type of running game, special teams, and same type of defense?