So tonight I was watching the NFL top 100 show, a show that I thought was pretty interesting and I liked seeing the highlights of the season. Right to start off with , as a matter of fact, number 30 I saw blue. It was Andrew Luck, my heart dropped because I knew that this had to be a joke, first saying there are 29 players in the NFL that are better than Luck I wasn't in love with but I think that 29 is to high had he been 15-18 that would have been better, but I think this was a little to high for Luck. What really grinds my gears is that his rookie year he was 23 I know his number were different but to say his rookie year was better, I don't know. I also really don't think Cam Newton was better than Luck.
Luck 2013-14 60.2% completed 3822 yards,23 TD, 9INT, 63 Rushes, 377 yards 4TD 2 Fumbles lost
Newton 2013-14 61.7% completed 3379 yards,24 TD 13 INT 111 Rushes 585 Yards 6 TD 1 Fumble lost
Luck had more yards and less interceptions,and a playoff win. All of this while behind a O-line that is sub par and losing his best receiver, also he had no running game.
I don't think Newton had a better year, but thats how the cookie crumbled