Corey Simon is on the Colts roster

For example, Blue states an opinion that McFarland and Simon would be an awesome tackle tandem. Your response is that Blue has been hitting the bong. That may be cute, but it doesn't support your point of view at all. I happen to agree with Blue. Why am I wrong? I don't know from your comment, I only know that you disagree. I am left to assume that it's because you are a biased Pats fan. I could just as easily say, "Brady is the most overrated QB of all time." But my saying it doesn't make it so.

As for misrepresentation, I think your characterization of Blue's Moss post fits the bill. I went back and re-read it to be sure; I don't see how it says that the Colts are "holier than thou." It seems to me that he was simply complaining about the Patriots assuming that mantle in the past. In fact, Blue specifically mentions that he doesn't think the Colts are stocked with angels (and refers to his earlier post calling out Dungy). I would add that with Rhodes and the Reids, it has not been a model offseason for the World Champions. However, neither I nor Blue nor any poster I've seen on this site claimed that it was. Pats fans and players (I can't say about you specifically because I simply don't know) have indeed played the "holier than thou" card often in the past. And the Pats doing everything better than every other professional sports team has certainly been a recurring theme in the national sports media in recent years. Just because Blue wrote a post shooting holes in this kind of sanctimony doesn't mean that Blue is commandeering the same kind of piffle for the Colts.

This is already longer than I'd intended, but when I get going it's hard to stop. My basic point is that the reason you've been attacked is because your most recent posts read like a homer who automatically gainsays anything that is either negative about the Pats or positive about the Colts. Which is not even to say that you're necessarily wrong (and I really do enjoy opposing views). But you're not going to convince many people of the validity of your arguments if you insult posters and misrepresent their opinions.    

It's my personal opinion that the 3-Superbowl team was built before brady arrived and that he is a good enough quarterback to step in and manage it through.  Nice job by Tom.  But now he has these excellent receivers--Randy Moss is statistically, through the first nine years, second only in stats to Jerry Rice.  If the Patriots tank it, will people blame it on Brady or on Moss?

This year isn't about the Colts repeating--it's about the Patriots.  This year the dynasty lives or dies.  This year either Brady moves into fame or obscurity--because his rings came too soon in his career, frankly.  He's going to play 16 or 17 years which means he's got a lot of years left to throw mediocre seasons and bury himself in the ranks of the "good".

We all know Manning, even without a ring, will be in the Hall because of his stats.  But Brady is going to need more than stats over the next 10 years of his career.  

So while you are over on our site bullying us, I'm waiting to see if the Patriots and their hero are going to sink or swim.

The Colts will be their usual selves.  They are better this year than last, but we have to see where the heart of the players is when the season starts.  The defense the Colts run requires more heart and effort than it does outstanding individual talent.  The players the Colts use are barely in the NFL so they play with lots of heart to stay there--which is why the Junes, Doss's, Davids and such do well in Indy.

Anyway, never fear about the Colts.  Worry about your own smorgashboard of talent.