Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Recap 2007 Pre-Season: Bears 27- Colts 24

Russ Purnell's new neck tie.
You see the image to the right, Mr. Purnell? That's for you if I see another performance like last night's from the Colts special teams. With so many positive things coming from last night's pre-season game against the Bears, the one reason the game wasn't a Colts blowout was specifically the god awful bad play of the special teams. The only thing worse than the Colts ST last night was Rex Grossman and Cedric Benson, but more on them later.

In lue of the ST horror show last night, I have to say I'm done with Russ Purnell. I'm just done with the guy. He's had six years to develop the Colts special teams into something resembling a professional football unit. And yet year, after year, after year this unit stinks. No, it's not because he only has young guys to work with. All teams use young guys on special teams. Chicago has young guys on special teams, and last night special teams was the only thing Chicago did right. The Colts held numerous practices during Training Camp specially working on special teams. They stress it year, after year, after year.

And yet, the results are the same.

Because of this, I gotta point my finger at the coach, Russ Purnell, and say I'm done with him. Dungy should fire him right now, promote someone from within, and get this damn thing fixed. I understand that change at this point might cause a ripple effect, but any change is better than seeing the Colts special teams allow scrubs like Daniel Manning torch the team with a BS return.

Ok, that's the negative. Now, the positives!

  • Ed Johnson is developing into a fine player. He is the unquestioned starter at DT and continues to improve. Again, maybe Booger's injury was a blessing in disguise.
  • The defense was electric. People flew to the ball, made hits, and tackling like demons. Marlin Jackson is now better than Nick Harper, and would have started this year over Harper even if Nick was re-signed. Marlin "rodeo" tackle of Devan Hester for a 2 yard loss provoked a "F*&k yeah!" out of me when it happened. His pick on Grossman was also quite good. Marlin is a stud.
  • Freddie Keiaho still continues to show he's a better linebacker than Cato June. First play from scrimmage, Grossman hands off to Benson. Benson is greeted at the LOS by Keiaho. Benson drops like a sack of bricks. I spied Freddie all evening while he was in there, and he was always around the football, making tackles and disrupting plays.
  • Anthony Gonzalez is FAST. They need to feed him the ball more with the first unit in a 3 WR set, because when he gets the ball he's the Flash.
  • Tony Ugoh played solid, and continues to improve. He's much more comfortable run blocking. In the second quarter he laid a vicious block to spring Joseph Addai for extra yardage. On passing downs, he was improved but only decent. Ryan Diem was the one who was bad last night.
  • I'm now a big Matt Giordano fan. He can't cover, but the man can tackle, hit, and runs, runs, runs. He was the only one tackling on special teams, and he made a great play on a screen pass preventing a first down.
  • Kenton Keith and Clifton Dawson played better than DeDe Dorsey. I expect to see them more in the third game.
  • Cut Jim Sorgi. He's terrible. Yes, he was good late in the second half on one drive. After that, he was bad to overthrowing wide open receivers, getting picked off, and generally scaring the crap out of us Colts fans. On the other side, Brian Greise looked sharp, accurate, and he didn't have near the talent around him that Sorgi did. Like Purnell, I'm done with Sorgi.
  • TJ Rushing might just have lost his starting returning job. Fumbles in situations like last night get you the Ricky Williams treatment. No, not THAT Ricky. The other Ricky Williams, a running back the Colts traded for back in 2003. He started one game against the Panthers four years ago. He had two costly fumbles in that game. He never started again, and was eventually cut.

Despite the special teams play, everything else was very good. I have to say, MNF, while improved with Jaws in the booth, is still pretty painful to watch and listen to. Tony Kornheiser is terrible, and is approaching Dennis miller critical mass. He isn't funny. He's annoying. And he doesn't know jack squat about football. So what's he doing in the damn booth? And no Bob Kravitz, it's not Michelle Tafoya's job to ask Peyton Manning about Michael Vick. Yes, Manning was annoyed she asked him, and for good reason.

No one cares what Manning thinks of Vick.

Vick's guilty. We all know it. We all move on. Goading Manning on Vick's plea is the same "gotcha journalism" that makes people turn the channel. No one cares what other players think of Vick, and no one cares for Michelle Tafoya. Female sideline reporters are there to look hot, smile, and offer viewers something else to look at than a fat offensive lineman or Kornheiser's bald head. They aren't journalists or reporters. They are eye candy, pure and simple. I personally would have no problem if TV did away with all sideline reporting. The only news worth anything from Tafoya's question is if Manning went off on a tirade bashing Vick, which you know he isn't going to do. We only care what the law and the NFL will do to him.

As always, thanks to the great Bears fans over at WCG. Though the Bears have a strong defense and special teams, Rex Grossman is awful (3 fumbles, 1 lost, 1 INT) and Cedric Benson is a major bust. I don't say this to piss of Bears fans, but after watching those two that night I see they haven't changed since last year.

0 recs | Comment 26 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Kravitz...
is an idiot.  Asking Manning's opinion of Vick is not a journalistic question, it's sensationalism.  I guarantee by the end of the week, espn.com will have a poll asking if everyone is sick of hearing about Vick, and when 90% of the people respond "yes", SportsCenter will devote an extra hour of coverage to explain how people are sick of hearing about it.

The coverage last night was horrible.  It took 20 minutes of Monday Night Countdown before they even mentioned the Colts and Bears.  They also stopped in the 2nd quarter when Sorgi was in for about 10 minutes to talk about Vick and didn't even mention that a game was going on.  Some people actually care about the backups and want to see how they are doing.

by the21eraser on Aug 21, 2007 10:54 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Noose is a bit over the top
Hope I don't screw up at work when you're my boss. =)

Rushing took a pretty good hit in an awkward twisted up position - I think he'll be fine.

Ugoh got run around on during passes with the 1st team defense out there. Manning was covering for him big-time, but I think he'll improve as the year goes on.

I think they would be better with Booger, at least from a depth perspective, but at least the defense looked good. Giordano was awesome. Special teams is going to cost the Colts a game or two this year.

I'm still wondering who is going to step up and run well behind Addai.

by SteveW on Aug 21, 2007 11:07 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also...
You can be done with Sorgi, but the problem is you have to put Betts in. I like the way Betts looks a lot of times, but he's interception prone. It happened in camp, and it happened in the game. Maybe that's something he can fix.

by SteveW on Aug 21, 2007 11:10 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Manning on SNL
I missed it during the offseason, so the clips they showed were the first I'd seen. Did anyone else think it was really weird to see Manning not looking awkward. He actually looked like an athlete. I guess it's just about whose around him. NFL players look a bit more athletic than the SNL cast.

by shake n bake on Aug 21, 2007 12:59 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll have to respectively disagree
with your assessment on Benson.  He had 10 carries for 24 yards.  He had John St. Clair, possibly the worst back-up offensive lineman I've ever seen starting instead of John Tait.  He'll be fine.  He had the same yards per carry as Thomas Jones last season, so I don't know why you say he is the same as last year as if that was a bad thing.  He played very well last year.  Yes, he fumbled the ball in the SB and got hurt, but that happens, especially when getting hit by an unblocked Bob Sanders (who is roughly the equivalent of Mike Brown...injured all the time, but a hell of a player).  

The out and out fumble by Grossman was great defense by you guys.  One botched snap was Kreutz's fault.  Yeah, I said it.  The other, possibly, but I couldn't really see.  The INT was a bad play, but running a drag with Rashied Davis is the stupidest play call on the face of the earth.  They were testing out your rookie and he won that battle.  Big deal.

Lots of Bears fans will call for Griese to start just like last year, but I'm not going to throw him under the bus until after game three, at the earliest.  We would still have plenty of time to win the division, especially since the Lions, Vikings, and Packers all suck royally...

Also, your special teams might suck and all, but they went up against the best special teams unit in the league, so it was a good exercise for them.  Maybe it will make them better.  You should be glad you had your weaknesses exposed now, rather than by Maurice Jones-Drew in week 7.

by mikebdot on Aug 21, 2007 1:08 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Benson and Rex
I think it's too soon to judge Benson one way or another.  He's a phenomenal talent, but he also seems like he might be a "play when I want to" type of guy.  I don't know that he'll do the little things like protecting the QB, when it's not about him.  I could be wrong, but I guess time will tell.  But I do agree that he had no holes to run through the other night.

Rex is a different story.  If anything, he's just the wrong QB for your team.  With the defense and special teams that the Bears have, they don't need a prolific offense to win a championship.  Sometimes, they don't even need an offense at all (a la Arizona last year).  They need a Trent Dilfer kind of guy.  A guy who understands that it's not his job to go out and win the game.  He just manages the offense, minimizes his own mistakes, and doesn't loose the game.  Why score 30 when 17 will do the trick?  Griese is that guy.  He's smart, knows his limitations, and manages the game well.  The only problem with Griese is that he's a band-aid.  He's injury prone and on the downslope of his career.  And the Bears would destroy Rex if they benched him and later if Griese got hurt and Lovie said, "Hey guy, we need you."  That in itself is the biggest problem with Rex, in my opinion.  He's "fragile".  He projects false confidence, and forces throws that aren't there because he's too busy trying to prove that he's the guy.  If I were a Bears fan, I'd be afraid that by the time Rex works out his mental issues, if he ever does, that the window to win a championship will have closed.

by rudy0498 on Aug 22, 2007 12:32 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't want a
game manager.  Watching Kyle Orton play football two years ago was so depressing.  I just don't want that.  We've had a great defense for quite awhile and I'm sick of watching us not be able to win in a shootout.  I know that wasn't required last year, but there are games where it will be required, especially if N.O. had actually been able to hold onto the football last year.  If they didn't have 3 TOs against us, forget about it.  A "game manager" would not have done.  It's that simple.  I know there are some Bears fans that are OK with that, and that's fine, but I'm not.  I want a QB that can march us down the field with regularity.  I think Grossman COULD be that guy and that's why I think he should start at least three games.  It is going to be 100% apparent if he isn't our future very quickly.  I just don't think you can make that judgment based on Monday's performance, especially with our awful line play.

Another reason I'm willing to give him a chance this year is because our team is stacked for the immediate future.  If Grossman can work out the kinks this year and realize his potential I honestly think there is no way we don't win 3 of 5 super bowls the next five years.  Our team is young, with the exception of the O-line and our draft picks have been so good recently I have no doubt we won't be drafting at least two of them next season to capably fill in the voids.  If he can't fix his problems I feel Griese is a great backup and will be that "trent dilfer type" guy.  By the way, how is Dilfer doing these days anyway?

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/DilfTr00.htm

I'm not sure that is something we should aspire to.  Shoot, even Tampa gave him TWO terrible years behind center before he became "servicable".

by mikebdot on Aug 22, 2007 12:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dilfer....
May not be in the league anymore, but wherever he is, he is still basking in the glow of his super bowl ring.

Grossman has more than a few kinks.  The guy honestly reminds me of Jeff George minus the whining.  He has all the physical tools and has the ability to make every throw on the field.  But he just can't get out of his own way.  He's too busy trying to be a "gunslinger" like Favre.  But doesn't have the short term memory loss to be successful at it.  For every Brett Favre, there are 20 Jeff Georges.  The fans and the media have already beaten to a pulp, and he'll never gain confidence to turn it around.  

3 to  5 super bowls? Really?  C'mon....you are projecting your team 5 years into the future with the competitive balance in today's NFL?  Our team is pretty young too and just won the Super Bowl, and even I would be delusional to make that statement.

by rudy0498 on Aug 22, 2007 3:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude, your defense sucks
we're stacked everywhere you look.  I think you could win 3 of 5 with Manning at QB.  You move the ball at will and picked up the slack for both your ST and defense last season.  With your new players you can't possibly be any worse than last season at stopping the run.  I suppose you could be worse at stopping the pass.  Either way, I think you all have a pretty good shot at 3 out of 5 too.  And, yes, I realize only one of us could do that, but if I were a Colts fan, I would say the same thing.  

My job as a fan is to be excited about the talent I see, and I see more talent on the Bears than I've ever seen.  That's right, I think we have as much talent as the '85 Bears.  Even WITH Rex at QB.  I've never made that claim in the 20+ years since.  

I think Rex could either be good, or not.  It doesn't really matter.  Look at how he played last season.  If he has a carbon copy season of last year we still go 13-3 and make it to the SB.  Maybe the balls bounce our way that night.  Heck, we could go 11-5 with the way he played last season without needing our awesome ST and defense.  But we still have those guys and sitting pretty.

by mikebdot on Aug 22, 2007 5:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your QB...
...is going to be great. He went to the superbowl his first full season as the starter. Why is everyone throwing him under the bus, even many in Chicago?

I remember Manning getting alot of abuse because we couldn't win the big one. I'd get so mad. A whole lot of good QB's never won a ring, including many current ones, but Manning took it on the chin for it. It's because he's great, so the expectations are high.

That is why Grossman is getting ripped more than the myriad of lousy Bears QB's before him. It's because he is great, but nobody is patient. Mark it down, he will have his ring(s). It's still early.

by coltsfanawalt on Aug 23, 2007 3:23 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He might get his rings ...
but not because he's a great player. Rex Grossman shows flashes of brilliance, but is extremely inconsistent. I tend to think this is his make-or-break season. If he can't pull it together, Chicago should look somewhere else.

by PaytonMenning on Aug 23, 2007 9:49 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

On that..
we can agree.  It is his contract year.  If he doesn't play well, he's gone.  It's pretty simple.

If he does play well and happens to win a ring, the media will jump off his back and maybe he can be allowed to be a great player.  I just hope to Halas he has 15 INTs or less this season.  Preferably not all in 5 games, just to shut everyone up.

by mikebdot on Aug 23, 2007 10:28 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I live in Chicago ...
so if I weren't a Colts fan, I'd be a Bears fan. The Bears are a great team, and have made many improvements this year. Rex is, like Tony Romo, still a question mark.

by PaytonMenning on Aug 23, 2007 11:40 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I also want to point out
that in that great Trent Dilfer "game manager" performance of the 2000 season here are his stats:

http://www.nfl.com/players/trentdilfer/gamelogs?id=DIL049692&season=2000

He went up against Kerry Collins and the Giants.  Their defense was terrible and Kerry Collins was a drunk.  The Ravens had 10 INTs in 3 playoffs games.  He threw 1 during those three games.  Lucky him.  The competition was terrible.

Also, in the regular season he started 8 games, played in 11, and threw 12 TDs and 11 INTs.  Those stats look very similar to Rex's 23/20.  Yes, Rex had more bad games, but he had more great ones too.  I'm not sure why anyone would fault a Rex supporter when they truly hope that he can simply eliminate the bad games.  If not, put in Griese, the game manager extraordinaire and be prepared to be bored while watching offense.  Screw that.  Ron Turner could simply ask Rex to be a game manager and I'm sure he'd turn into one, but that's not how he rolls.  

by mikebdot on Aug 23, 2007 11:53 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

actually
it was 4 playoff games.  There isn't a clean break on the game by game sheet.  The Denver game had to be a playoff game, otherwise they would have had a week off between 12/31 and 1/7...

2 of those 10 picks were returned for scores.

by mikebdot on Aug 23, 2007 11:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also
Giordano's "great play" on the screen pass was just piss poor awareness by Benson.  They never ran screens last year so he's still learning.  If he had waited for the 3 blockers that were standing there I don't think Matt would have done much.  Plus just because he makes the last tackle on special teams (or tackles Hester in the end zone) doesn't mean he made a good play.  Perhaps he should have tackled him 60 yards further down the field...

by mikebdot on Aug 21, 2007 1:11 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

anyone else
watch PTI and enjoy kornheiser's commentary?  i think he's great.

by yellowsnow on Aug 21, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

mikebdot
I'll have to respectfully disagree with YOUR assessment of Cedric Benson.  While he did manage to maintain the same YPC average last year as Thomas Jones, he took roughly half as many carries, and was largely coming fresh off the bench for those carries that he did take.  Plus, in this particular game, his 2.4 YPC average is well below not only his and Thomas Jones' average from last year, but far below the average for a starting back period.

I also notice that you call many other plays "some other guys fault" or "a stupid play" - like the drag with Rashied Davis, why is the the stupidest play on earth?  Maybe if Grossman had bought the time for Davis to move into the drag, and not try to hit him on the turn (when the corner also is going to be watching the QBs eyes in case of a post or inside slant route as opposed to the drag) that play would not have been made.  Marlin simply made the play his position would call for held onto the play.  I call that a solid defensive play that took opportunity the offense game up.

And although you have history on your side when it comes to your NFC North comments, don't speak your judgements too quickly, as two teams in the division might present quite a bit more of a challenge than they did last year.

Also, in your second post, you have to give me a break.  Faulting Giordano for where his assignment was?  Yeah, he probably could have had a chance 10-15 yards earlier but the Bears have a great return team as a whole, and also Giordano doesn't exactly have Hester speed.

by Bullard47 on Aug 21, 2007 3:08 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

CB is a beast
Yeah, those 10 carries are a great sample size.  Especially without their starting LT.  John St. Clair is just plain terrible.  He broke the foot of the Texan safety last week.  You can't expect punishing runs when there is no hole.  Your front 4 did a good job plugging things up.  Or our blocking was awful.  Take your pick.

The drag to Rashied Davis is stupid because he is 5'9" and about 175 lbs.  At most.  The guy in the slot running a drag for a 1st down catch should be big.  It really should have been a tight end.  I don't like Davis very much.  He made two big catches last year and that was it.  He runs up the seam quickly, like every other receiver in the league.  Big deal.  

I'll speak my judgements as I see fit.  If we went 0-3 history is on my side that we could start Griese and go 9-7 and win the division.  Jon Kitna sucks way worse than Grossman, even on a "bad rex" day.  Favre is too old and has no talent around him.  And Minnesota is just a joke, except maybe their defense.  We'll see in due time.  

How do you know what Giorano's assignment was?  Seriously.  Maybe it was to tackle him at the opposing 30.  That's all I'm saying.

by mikebdot on Aug 21, 2007 3:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Out of curiosity
How do you support your claim that Kitna "sucks way worse than Grossman, even on a 'bad Rex' day?" I'm not saying Kitna is Peyton or anything, but his numbers were clearly superior to Rex's last year:

Kitna: 4208 yds, 62.4 comp %, 79.9 rating, 21 TD/ 22 INT

Grossman: 3193 yds, 54.6 comp %, 73.9 rating, 23 TD/ 20 INT

Kitna was better in every major category with the exception of TD/INT (and those were pretty close). Kitna also wins in more inside-the-numbers categories like yards per attempt (7.1 to 6.7). I know the Lions threw more than the Bears last year, but that doesn't explain Kitna's superiority in things like comp %, rating, and yards per attempt. It seems to me that Kitna is better than the average of Rex's season; yet you claim that he sucks worse than Rex even on Rex's bad days.

I'm not even being snarky, I'm curious as to what support you have for that postion, beyond an obvious bias for Rex.  

by ctnyc on Aug 21, 2007 11:39 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, as it turns out...
Comp% and Yards per attempt affect the rating, in fact, those are the sole reason his rating is higher.  But, if you watched any Lions games last year, you'll know that they got down a lot very often and had teams playing prevent defense to prevent the big play.  They spread the field and don't run to open up the pass, they pass to open up the run.  The Bears offensive ethos just plain pisses me off.  I could go on and on about it, but you'd be bored.  In any event, I was using hyperbole.  Plus, Kitna is like a 11th year guy?  Rex just finished his first year starting.  Plus, Kitna's 7.1 ypa was the best in his career (not including the three games he played in '97).  

I have some amount of faith in Rex and hope to Halas he fixes this latest "issue" (which, after looking at the first fumbled snap was clearly Kreutz's fault, go to chicagobears.com and check out the highlights from the game, the ENTIRE offensive line moved), but like I say, Griese is capable of at least going 9-4 to finish the season, especially playing in our division...

In any event, I'm frontin' quite a bit.  I'm mildly worried about the Lions, but it's the same thing every year.  They draft a wideout, he's a bust, and life goes on.  I swear, they have THE worst luck (aka Matt Millen).  Honestly, it's almost a certainty that Johnson will be a stud, but there will be a freak injury and he'll be out for three years.  I would almost best money on it...

by mikebdot on Aug 22, 2007 11:52 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree...
Giordano is every bit as fast as Hester is.  He caught up to him in the Super Bowl, just too late.

Don't get me wrong, Hester would win a 40 yard dash, and he's way more agile and has better acceleration,  but Giordano is pretty damn fast if you're just running in the open field.

by the21eraser on Aug 21, 2007 3:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hester let up
while watching himself on the jumbotron...of course he caught him.

by mikebdot on Aug 21, 2007 4:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Life is good . . .
when our biggest concerns as Colts fans revolve around our backup QB.  Personally, I could care less who we have as a backup, unless we could land someone like Drew Brees or something.  I mean, honestly, Peyton is the straw that stirs the drink, and if he goes down, we are screwed.  There is no one else that can come in and fill in for him.  We would just have to agree that it sucks, and hope our D could play well enough to pull out some wins until he got back.  And if, god forbid, it was worse, I don't even think I would want to go to the playoffs without him.
The Shogun of Harlem

by shonuff on Aug 21, 2007 3:20 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Take it easy on Rushing ...
This is his first big mistake, it's a bit early to string him up isn't it?

by PaytonMenning on Aug 22, 2007 10:30 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Very true..
And his knee was down when the ball was stripped.  That would have been overturned had it not been pre-season.

by the21eraser on Aug 22, 2007 11:10 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cassieper_small
Stampede Blue is the #8 NFL Blog on Internet, #1 SB Nation Blog
Gocoltsskel3_small
"Why Pats fans, why?"
Img_0229_small
Marv to Big D?
Stampedeblue_small
There is no blog war with 18to88
Img_0229_small
Good little story on Wheeler
Asobi2_small
Colts Games on iTunes
Cassieper_small
Multiple Sources: Favre is Already Inked
2073684986_s_small
smash and dash done?
Small
Without Vinatieri, Brady would have just 1 ring.
Nflj_10_small
Colts' Most Durable Players

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Shatner_small MasterRWayne

Contributing Writers

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Change_small Colts Homer

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports