/cdn.vox-cdn.com/photo_images/4100265/125591009.jpg)
Game Two for the Colts without Peyton Manning looked a little better than game one, but it was one of those games where about midway through the third quarter you could just sense nothing good was going to come yesterday. There was a stretch, pointed out by WNDE's Derek Schultz, where the Colts were just awful on offense:
Looking at Indy's drive chart from yesterday. After cutting deficit to 14-12, they gained a total of six yards on their next five drives.
With the deficiencies we all know exist defensively, wasting five drives makes it almost impossible to win. Obviously both sides are ultimately responsible, but stretches like that just can't happen if the Colts want to win. A couple other notes on the game:
- This was the first time since 1998, Manning's rookie season, that the Colts have started 0-2. When you continually win 12 games in a season, it makes it difficult to start with two straight losses.
- This was the first time the Browns have defeated the Colts since 1994, back when Kerry Cash, Floyd Turner, and Carlos Etheredge were catching passes from Jim Harbaugh. It was also the most points scored by the Colts against the Browns since 2002, spanning three games. Didn't do them much good though.
After the jump we'll look at the stats to see just where things went wrong...
Non-Adjusted Stats for Week 2:
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 66.7% | 21 | 72.4% | 18 | N | Y | 7-0 |
ANPY/A | 3.775 | 29 | 6.576 | 16 | N | Y | 7-2 |
Turnovers | 2 | 17 | 1 | 17 | N | Y | 8-2 |
Yds/Drive | 25.91 | 24 | 27.55 | 12 | N | N | 6-3 |
ToP/Drive | 2:18.7 | 23 | 3:08.5 | 27 | N | Y | 7-1 |
Yds/Play | 4.318 | 27 | 4.522 | 8 | N | N | 5-2 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.73 | 14 | 1.64 | 16 | N | N | 6-3 |
3rd/4th Down | 28.6% | 26 | 52.9% | 28 | N | Y | 6-1 |
Avg Start Pos | 21.7 | 28 | 41.7 | 32 | N | Y | 8-2 |
3 and Outs | 6 | 25 | 3 | 18 | N | Y | 5-2 |
RZ Eff | 61.9% | 18 | 71.4% | 17 | N | Y | 5-2 |
Plays/Drive | 6.000 | 11 | 6.091 | 23 | N | N | 4-2 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 0.318 | 3 | 0.731 | 21 | N | N | 5-5 |
RB Success | 50.0% | 10 | 47.1% | 17 | N | N | 3-1 |
Yds/Carry | 4.19 | 13 | 3.12 | 8 | Y | N | 1-5 |
Net Punts Yds/Game | 39.00 | 21 | 40.20 | 15 | N | N | 2-3 |
Ranking - Week (32) | 26 | 21 | 26 | ||||
Ranking - Season (64) | 49 | 44 | 53 |
Adjusted Stats for Week 2:
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 73.4% | 15 | 83.8% | 31 | N | Y | 7-0 |
ANPY/A | 7.719 | 12 | 7.400 | 23 | N | Y | 7-2 |
Turnovers | 1.9 | 19 | 2.3 | 10 | N | Y | 8-2 |
Yds/Drive | 36.99 | 8 | 41.29 | 25 | N | N | 6-3 |
ToP/Drive | 2:35.1 | 22 | 3:17.0 | 29 | N | Y | 7-1 |
Yds/Play | 6.366 | 7 | 6.631 | 30 | N | N | 5-2 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.98 | 12 | 2.30 | 27 | N | N | 6-3 |
3rd/4th Down | 11.6% | 32 | 55.6% | 29 | N | Y | 6-1 |
Avg Start Pos | 26.9 | 20 | 29.2 | 19 | N | Y | 8-2 |
3 and Outs | 2.8 | 11 | 4.3 | 15 | N | Y | 5-2 |
RZ Eff | 64.5% | 18 | 79.5% | 23 | N | Y | 5-2 |
Plays/Drive | 6.031 | 9 | 6.364 | 25 | N | N | 4-2 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 1.099 | 22 | 0.182 | 29 | N | N | 5-5 |
RB Success | 47.2% | 10 | 56.0% | 28 | N | N | 3-1 |
Yds/Carry | 2.95 | 25 | 5.82 | 28 | Y | N | 1-5 |
Net Punts Yds/Game | 37.38 | 22 | 45.30 | 28 | N | N | 2-3 |
Ranking - Week (32) | 17 | 30 | 27 | ||||
Ranking - Season (64) | 28 | 62 | 52 |
Some thoughts:
- I'm going to focus on the Adjusted numbers, as they paint a little better picture. However, because it is so early in the season, there is considerable error in the numbers, due to a small sample size.
- The Colts offense, when not getting into Third Downs, was actually decent yesterday. Most of the drive stats were either average, or even slightly above average (Yards/Drive and Plays/Drive), except for one...
- The third down offense was atrocious, worst in the league. Manning was brilliant on Third Down throughout his entire career, making this look even worse. This absolutely must change if the Colts expect to win anytime soon.
- Field Position looks to be right back where it's comfortable too, worst in the league. The more things change, the more things stay exactly the same.
- I can't pull any positives from the defense yesterday. The raw numbers don't look terrible, but this wasn't some kind of juggernaut offense the Browns have. Will it stay as the worst defensive performance of the season, for all teams? No, it won't. But for now, that's what the stats say.
Season Stats Through Week 2 (Adjusted):
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Best | Defense | Rank | Best | Record | Win % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 69.9% | 15 | Patriots | 79.0% | 30 | Jets | 14-3 | 0.824 |
ANPY/A | 6.591 | 12 | Cowboys | 5.663 | 19 | Jets | 16-2 | 0.889 |
Turnovers | 1.54 | 12 | Titans | 2.75 | 7 | Ravens | 14-3 | 0.824 |
Yds/Drive | 31.61 | 10 | Patriots | 36.69 | 25 | Jets | 11-3 | 0.786 |
ToP/Drive | 2:33.0 | 20 | Redskins | 3:12.0 | 29 | Jets | 14-2 | 0.875 |
Yds/Play | 5.483 | 12 | Patriots | 6.133 | 30 | Browns | 11-4 | 0.733 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.75 | 14 | Patriots | 2.03 | 26 | Dolphins | 12-5 | 0.706 |
3rd/4th Down | 7.2% | 32 | Raiders | 53.6% | 28 | Broncos | 16-3 | 0.842 |
Avg Start Pos | 31.2 | 16 | Browns | 31.0 | 16 | Bengals | 13-3 | 0.813 |
3 and Outs | 3.28 | 14 | Texans | 4.59 | 11 | Browns | 8-4 | 0.667 |
RZ Eff | 59.4% | 19 | Raiders | 77.9% | 25 | Cardinals | 12-5 | 0.706 |
Plays/Drive | 5.940 | 10 | Chargers | 6.044 | 23 | Jets | 8-4 | 0.667 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 1.011 | 22 | Chargers | 0.217 | 29 | Redskins | 11-6 | 0.647 |
RB Success | 45.3% | 12 | Buccaneers | 56.5% | 29 | Giants | 8-5 | 0.615 |
Yds/Carry | 2.83 | 24 | Vikings | 5.65 | 28 | Giants | 4-7 | 0.364 |
Net Punts Yds/Game | 33.59 | 24 | Broncos | 43.40 | 30 | Raiders | 10-9 | 0.526 |
Overall | 14 | Packers | 29 | Jets |
A couple more thoughts:
- The Offense looks merely average in the first two weeks, but there are two glaring differences: Third/Fourth Down and the Red Zone Efficiency. Let's take a look at the Red Zone number real quick. The Colts have had 6 trips to the red zone this season, and they've scored only 20 of the possible 42 points. Last season, the Colts were 80% in the Red Zone, meaning they'd have scored 34 points in those trips. That means just in the Red Zone, Manning is worth a touchdown per week. Wow.
- The Defense is causing turnovers, which is great to see. However, when they don't cause a turnover, the opposing offense pretty much has their way with them. Really nothing good has happened as of yet. Ugh.
- Running the ball, and stopping the run has led to more losses than wins this season, no matter the rushing stat you prefer. The Colts did it on Sunday, and clearly didn't work out for them.
Week-by-Week Comparisons:
Colts | Opponent | Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
1 | Texans | 56 | 47 | 59 | 35 | 47 | 49 |
2 | Browns | 49 | 44 | 53 | 28 | 62 | 52 |
Neither game was any good (duh), so we'll keep an eye on how the Colts improve throughout the season. I think this is where Jim Caldwell should be evaluated. Showing improvement should be something we see out of the Colts, regardless of who is playing Quarterback. Giving him a complete pass because there's no Peyton Manning doesn't make sense. More losses like Sunday's to the Browns, however, should make the Colts Front Office re-evaluate their Head Coach.