/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/51315075/GettyImages-613624828.0.jpg)
We've talked numerous times about how teams can play poorly but still come out on the winning end, as well as the opposite of that, and it really doesn't surprise me. A well-timed turnover, a special teams TD, or any number of other things can influence a game on the scoreboard but have the opposite effect over the course of the entire game. The Colts played one of those games Sunday, not playing particularly well, but better than their opponent when they needed to be, winning 29-23 against the Bears, putting them right back in the AFC South race, thanks to the Texans losing in Minnesota.
The game Sunday didn't follow the typical script of Colts games, but there was just that feeling throughout that the Colts should have been pulling away, but they kept letting the Bears hang around and hang around, even giving them the lead in the 4th quarter, but ultimately fizzling out just outside the Colts Red Zone, thanks in large part to a holding call on 3rd down. The Colts stopped them on the final two plays, and a 13 yard run on first down by Frank Gore sealed the Colts second victory of the season.
As a quick aside on taking the penalty there on 3rd and 15, if you go straight off of win probabilities, it would have been slightly better to decline the penalty and force them into 4th and 5 (79.83% to 80.65%), but I'm not going to quibble too much the decision. When they are that close I'm good with going on a personal preference, which presumably Chuck Pagano did.
We all know that the Colts play in a lot of close games, and have won many more than they've lost. But according to Elias, Andrew Luck to T.Y. Hilton is the most prolific duo in the NFL:
Andrew Luck's 35-yard scoring pass to T.Y. Hilton with 3:43 remaining was the game-winning touchdown in the Colts' victory over the Bears. It was the fourth game-winning TD pass from Luck to Hilton in the last 4:00 of the fourth quarter, all of them since 2013. No other pair of teammates has combined for that many game-winning TD pass plays in the final four minutes of the fourth quarter over the last four seasons.
It's good those two have been able to connect so often late in games to pull out victories, but at a certain point it'd be nice to not need late-game heroics to win every game.
Let's jump into the stats, where you'll see where the Colts struggled, and just how similar this game was to the other three they've lost this season.
Non-Adjusted Stats for Week 5:
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 71.0% | 15 | 77.1% | 22 | N | N | 6-3 |
ANPY/A | 7.682 | 10 | 10.163 | 26 | N | N | 4-0 |
Turnovers | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | N | N | 6-2 |
Yds/Drive | 36.00 | 9 | 52.20 | 28 | N | N | 6-2 |
ToP/Drive | 2:43.2 | 16 | 3:00.5 | 17 | N | Y | 7-1 |
Yds/Play | 6.092 | 6 | 8.419 | 28 | N | N | 3-2 |
Orange Zone Eff | 57.1% | 14 | 46.9% | 6 | Y | N | 2-4 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.82 | 14 | 2.50 | 24 | N | N | 6-2 |
3rd/4th Down | 30.8% | 18 | 20.0% | 3 | N | N | 6-1 |
Avg Start Pos | 30.9 | 9 | 21.5 | 6 | Y | N | 10-1 |
3 and Outs | 3 | 7 | 2 | 23 | N | N | 7-1 |
RZ Eff | 71.4% | 12 | 61.9% | 5 | Y | N | 1-5 |
Plays/Drive | 5.909 | 12 | 6.200 | 18 | N | N | 7-1 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 1.046 | 21 | 1.290 | 4 | N | N | 5-3 |
RB Success | 46.7% | 15 | 38.9% | 6 | Y | N | 2-5 |
Yds/Carry | 4.67 | 9 | 6.58 | 27 | N | N | 3-5 |
Ranking - Week (28) | 10 | 21 | 16 | ||||
Ranking - Season (154) | 53 | 115 | 96 |
Adjusted Stats for Week 5:
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 73.3% | 10 | 79.8% | 25 | N | N | 6-3 |
ANPY/A | 7.695 | 8 | 9.676 | 27 | N | N | 4-0 |
Turnovers | 0.3 | 7 | 0.8 | 18 | N | N | 6-2 |
Yds/Drive | 37.36 | 9 | 50.62 | 28 | N | N | 6-2 |
ToP/Drive | 2:41.8 | 18 | 3:09.7 | 23 | N | Y | 7-1 |
Yds/Play | 6.215 | 7 | 8.014 | 27 | N | N | 3-2 |
Orange Zone Eff | 61.9% | 11 | 53.3% | 12 | Y | N | 2-4 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.97 | 10 | 2.53 | 26 | N | N | 6-2 |
3rd/4th Down | 30.3% | 19 | 28.9% | 7 | N | N | 6-1 |
Avg Start Pos | 27.9 | 15 | 23.1 | 7 | Y | N | 10-1 |
3 and Outs | 2.5 | 8 | 2.0 | 27 | N | N | 7-1 |
RZ Eff | 73.6% | 12 | 66.9% | 10 | Y | N | 1-5 |
Plays/Drive | 6.052 | 10 | 6.404 | 25 | N | N | 7-1 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 1.058 | 23 | 1.357 | 3 | N | N | 5-3 |
RB Success | 47.1% | 17 | 39.7% | 8 | Y | N | 2-5 |
Yds/Carry | 4.71 | 9 | 6.43 | 28 | N | N | 3-5 |
Ranking - Week (28) | 10 | 27 | 21 | ||||
Ranking - Season (154) | 38 | 143 | 109 |
Some thoughts:
- I painted a pretty morbid scene about the game Sunday, but in all honesty the Offense played pretty well, with one of the glaring weaknesses was their lack of Touchdowns scored instead of field goals, even though their ranks were middle-of-the-pack. Another 4 points would have made the ending a lot less tense.
- They didn't commit any turnovers, which is always a good thing and makes it much easier to win games. More of these games please.
- Lots of stats in the top 10, which is about where their league standing is overall (as you'll see down below), so they were right on where they've been this year, and they've been pretty good.
- Along with the Red and Orange Zone stats I referenced above, the 3rd/4th down numbers weren't all that good either. At least it seemed they stopped when they were in field goal range.
- The Defense? Yikes. They were the 2nd worst pass Defense of the weekend, giving up nearly 10 Adjusted Yards per Pass Attempt, and gave up over 50 yards per drive, and it was the 4th worst game of the whole NFL season so far.
- The Rushing Defensive stats are interesting as well. Lots of runs were unsuccessful, but they got a lot of yards running the ball, gaining over 6.5 yards per carry. There was the big 57 yard run by Jordan Howard that is also skewing things here as well, which is why I like the Success Rate stat better.
- The Bears were only 20% on 3rd/4th Down, which was the other really good thing the Defense did. So how do they have such awful drive stats? They kept converting first downs before getting to third down, which is obviously a problem.
Season Stats through Week 5 (Adjusted):
Statistic | Offense | Rank | Best | Defense | Rank | Best | Record | Win % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSR | 71.7% | 8 | Falcons | 74.2% | 27 | Texans | 26-5 | 0.839 |
ANPY/A | 5.806 | 15 | Falcons | 6.939 | 29 | Broncos | 31-1 | 0.969 |
Turnovers | 1.41 | 9 | Bills | 1.29 | 27 | Cardinals | 34-9 | 0.791 |
Yds/Drive | 31.08 | 13 | Falcons | 35.92 | 32 | Ravens | 22-5 | 0.815 |
ToP/Drive | 2:41.0 | 17 | Cowboys | 2:47.0 | 22 | Texans | 29-13 | 0.690 |
Yds/Play | 5.277 | 17 | Falcons | 6.067 | 31 | Broncos | 17-6 | 0.739 |
Orange Zone Eff | 59.8% | 11 | 49ers | 57.2% | 21 | Rams | 21-10 | 0.677 |
First Downs/Drive | 1.85 | 8 | Cowboys | 2.00 | 31 | Texans | 25-9 | 0.735 |
3rd/4th Down | 39.1% | 16 | Saints | 40.3% | 21 | Texans | 22-6 | 0.786 |
Avg Start Pos | 27.6 | 31 | Eagles | 27.6 | 7 | Patriots | 33-14 | 0.702 |
3 and Outs | 3.53 | 13 | Redskins | 3.38 | 21 | Texans | 21-11 | 0.656 |
RZ Eff | 77.5% | 3 | Saints | 67.9% | 18 | Rams | 23-13 | 0.639 |
Plays/Drive | 5.877 | 7 | Cowboys | 5.864 | 23 | Texans | 26-13 | 0.667 |
Penalty Yds / Play | 0.896 | 21 | 49ers | 1.150 | 1 | Colts | 25-14 | 0.641 |
RB Success | 46.4% | 11 | Panthers | 48.6% | 27 | Ravens | 14-21 | 0.400 |
Yds/Carry | 4.12 | 19 | Bills | 4.66 | 28 | Packers | 14-20 | 0.412 |
Overall | 8 | Falcons | 30 | Texans |
A couple thoughts:
- Here's your firepower when people talk about Andrew Luck being the problem with the 2016 Colts: Offense is 8th overall in the NFL, while the Defense is 30th. Which side is the problem here? What's worse is the Defense/Special Teams is giving the Offense the 2nd worst Starting Field Position in the league, so they're doing it with almost the longest fields to go.
- I really like seeing a top 10 ranking in Turnovers, as they've been awful at this the last two seasons. Please keep this up.
- The Defense is bad, only being slightly below average in the Red Zone, but much worse everywhere else, including dead last in Yards per Drive.
Week-to-Week Comparision:
Colts | Opponent | Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
1 | Lions | 5 | 151 | 80 | 19 | 146 | 98 |
2 | Broncos | 101 | 123 | 132 | 72 | 131 | 124 |
3 | Chargers | 55 | 55 | 33 | 47 | 60 | 34 |
4 | Jaguars | 73 | 72 | 65 | 98 | 107 | 122 |
5 | Bears | 53 | 115 | 96 | 38 | 143 | 109 |
Look at this week's game and the three the Colts have lost, and you'll see they are incredibly consistent (but sadly not good), and they all saw the Colts have a chance to win in the end, but only came out on the winning side once. Quite honestly, I think they're lucky to have gotten one of those games with how poorly they've played, but these were all games they've won 75% of the time in previous seasons, so they've never faced this kind of scrutiny before, even though they absolutely should have for winning all those close games. These are the things I hope you're learning from all these stats: Wins and losses are the public face of the team, but you can tell a lot more when you look a little deeper.